Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Large-scale short-read bulk RNA-seq from ant (Lasius niger) achieving A-grade with perfect 100/100 score on 7.9 billion bases. Strong base quality (Q30=91%, mean 35.4) and low adapter content (1.33%) support high-confidence reuse, despite moderate duplication at 23.05%.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0