SRR3141494

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bulk RNA-seq from an ant (Lasius niger) with high-quality Illumina HiSeq 2500 data. Grade A with perfect 100/100 score driven by exceptional Q30 bases (90.6%, the primary quality metric) and mean base quality (35.2), both consistently meeting or exceeding reference standards. Minimal adapter contamination (1.04%) and manageable duplication (19.11%) pose no barriers to reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Lasius niger

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6798829342 reported

total reads 33657571 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 93.9 measured

pct q30 bases 90.6 measured

gc content pct 40.4 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.2 measured

adapter content pct 1.04 measured

duplication rate pct 19.11 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 1.04 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 19.11 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0