Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
19/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-seq of Homalonychus theologus (arachnid) via Illumina HiSeq 2500, yielding 31.2 million reads with moderate base quality (80% Q20, 69.1% Q30). Lower fidelity than most datasets in this set suggests potential instrument drift or sample degradation; apply stricter QC filters before downstream analysis. Nonetheless suitable for broad transcriptome surveys and homology-based gene annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0