SRR3144557

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

40/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 4000 A. mellifera transcriptome producing ~4.55 billion bases and ~15.2 million reads at Q30 61.5%, with moderate base quality similar to other problematic bee runs.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Apis mellifera

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4553856152 reported

total reads 15187896 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 78.3 measured

pct q30 bases 61.5 measured

gc content pct 41.3 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 29.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 18.67 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 40/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 61.5 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 29.7 measured ×0.6 28%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 18.67 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0