Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq on the HiSeq 4000 platform captures the Apis mellifera transcriptome at 15 million reads with moderate base quality (84% Q20, 69% Q30), adequate for standard gene expression profiling across colonies or developmental stages. The honeybee dataset supports comparative transcriptomics in this social insect model. Q30 below optimal thresholds suggests reduced confidence for low-frequency variant calls; filtering or trimming is recommended for sensitive work.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0