Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq on the early Genome Analyzer II platform provides 16 million reads from Bombyx mori (silkworm) with moderate quality (92.5% Q20, 83% Q30), supporting basic gene expression quantification for silk production or developmental studies. The dataset enables comparative transcriptomics in this economically important insect. Platform age and moderate Q30 suggest some read degradation; filter low-quality bases before alignment for best results.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0