← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Bemisia tabaci
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3994200056
reported
total reads
13225828
reported
n content pct
0.048
measured
pct q20 bases
89.9
measured
pct q30 bases
85.7
measured
gc content pct
43
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
33.3
measured
adapter content pct
29.28
measured
duplication rate pct
45.45
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 66/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
85.7
measured
×1
79%
mean base quality
33.3
measured
×0.6
88%
adapter content pct
29.28
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
45.45
measured
×0.4
66%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0