SRR3179641

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

72/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bulk RNA-seq from whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) achieving grade C with 72/100 score, limited by severe adapter contamination (25.7%, scored 0/100) and high duplication (45.86%, scored 65/100). Base quality metrics are slightly declining (Q30=87.4%) relative to comparable samples. Multiple compounding issues make this dataset marginal for reuse without aggressive preprocessing.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bemisia tabaci

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2118089684 reported

total reads 7013542 reported

n content pct 0.038 measured

pct q20 bases 91.5 measured

pct q30 bases 87.4 measured

gc content pct 44.6 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 25.7 measured

duplication rate pct 45.86 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 72/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.4 measured ×1 87%

mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%

adapter content pct 25.7 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 45.86 measured ×0.4 65%

QC cost 46 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0