SRR3180025

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

59/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Poor-quality RNA-seq unsuitable for reuse without extensive preprocessing; 12.6% adapter contamination and only 81.3% Q30 bases indicate library quality issues requiring fresh preparation or rigorous trimming if reprocessing.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bemisia tabaci

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3015656400 reported

total reads 10052188 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 86.8 measured

pct q30 bases 81.3 measured

gc content pct 40.7 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 32 measured

adapter content pct 12.6 measured

duplication rate pct 41.57 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 59/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.3 measured ×1 56%

mean base quality 32 measured ×0.6 67%

adapter content pct 12.6 measured ×0.4 41%

duplication rate pct 41.57 measured ×0.4 74%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0