Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Helicoverpa armigera (cotton bollworm) via Illumina HiSeq 2000, generating 19.5 million short reads with high base quality (96.2% Q20, 90.3% Q30, 49.3% GC). Enables gene expression analysis in this economically important agricultural pest. No experimental treatment or tissue specification provided.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0