Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from Tribolium castaneum, a coleopteran developmental model, on the HiSeq 2000 with 16.6 million reads at good quality (94.5% Q20, 85.5% Q30) supports comparative transcriptomics across developmental stages, tissues, or treatment conditions. The dataset enables beetle genomics research for developmental and evolutionary questions. Quality metrics are adequate for robust expression quantification and moderate-sensitivity variant work.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0