Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Deep whole-genome short-read sequencing of Bos taurus on the HiSeq 2500 achieves 21.3× coverage with 230 million reads at high base quality (96.4% Q20, 92.9% Q30), enabling genome-wide SNP discovery and copy-number profiling in cattle. The dataset supports breeding applications and disease association studies in this economically important livestock. Coverage is well-suited for reliable genotyping at all allele frequencies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0