Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
31/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup on the HiSeq 2500 provides ~1.6 million reads at lower base quality (81.2% Q20, 67.2% Q30) across this ~4.5 Mb bacterial genome, supporting SNP discovery for strain differentiation and outbreak tracking. The dataset enables phylogenetic studies in food safety and epidemiology contexts. Moderate quality metrics warrant careful filtering and validation before clinical interpretation of called variants.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0