Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing of *Acinetobacter baumannii*, a Gram-negative nosocomial pathogen, yielding ~8.1M short reads (84.2% Q30 bases, 39.4% GC content). Suitable for SNP discovery, variant annotation, and phylogenomic comparisons in this clinically important bacterium, though short reads limit structural-variant detection. Search: bacterial genome, WGS, pathogenic *Acinetobacter*.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0