← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli O104:H4 str. 11-4404
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
774530620
reported
total reads
3834310
reported
n content pct
0.011
measured
pct q20 bases
98.6
measured
pct q30 bases
98.6
measured
gc content pct
51
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
29.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
duplication rate pct
15.57
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 94/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
98.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
15.57
measured
×0.5
76%
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0