Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3417190

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

RNA-seq of the calcareous sponge *Leuconia nivea* via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 101 bp reads and solid quality (96.4% Q20), supporting transcriptome annotation and gene expression studies. Moderate depth (27.1M reads) is suitable for reference transcriptome assembly but limited for profiling rare or condition-specific transcripts.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Leuconia nivea
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 5464310686 reported
total reads 27051043 reported
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 96.4 measured
pct q30 bases 91 measured
gc content pct 49.3 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 35.3 measured
adapter content pct 0.88 measured
duplication rate pct 27.16 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.3 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.88 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 27.16 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50