Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3417192

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

RNA-seq of the calcareous sponge *Clathrina coriacea* via Illumina HiSeq 2000 generating 101 bp reads with high quality (96.3% Q20), enabling transcriptome assembly and gene expression profiling. Modest depth is adequate for reference transcriptome construction but limits power to detect condition-dependent or cell-type-specific expression.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Clathrina coriacea
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 4871966694 reported
total reads 24118647 reported
n content pct 0.005 measured
pct q20 bases 96.3 measured
pct q30 bases 91.2 measured
gc content pct 47.8 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 35.4 measured
adapter content pct 0.63 measured
duplication rate pct 53.85 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.2 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.63 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 53.85 measured ×0.4 47%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50