Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS with concerning Q30 base quality (78%, scoring 40/100), limiting downstream variant calling confidence and structural variant reliability. Despite excellent duplication (0.63%) and adapter content (0.72%), the Q30 shortfall is the primary constraint for reuse. The reported coverage (40.7×) is extrapolated rather than measured (evidence_strength=0.61), requiring a deep measured validation pass.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0