Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq from Aedes aegypti (dengue and Zika vector) on the early Genome Analyzer platform shows perfect base quality (100% Q20, 100% Q30) across 12.6 million reads. The dataset supports gene expression profiling of innate immunity, metabolism, or vector competence in this disease vector mosquito. Legacy platform status and small dataset size (~500 Mb) suggest use for validation or comparative studies rather than primary quantification.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0