Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq from Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, a beneficial biocontrol beetle, on the HiSeq 2000 shows perfectly high quality bases (100% Q20, 100% Q30) across 13 million reads and 2.4 billion bases. The dataset enables gene expression profiling of feeding, reproduction, or host-seeking behaviors relevant to biological pest control. Exceptional base quality supports sensitive variant discovery and detailed isoform analysis if needed.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0