Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq from Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly), a major agricultural pest, on the HiSeq 2000 with 34.8 million reads at good quality (94.4% Q20, 87% Q30) enables gene expression profiling of reproduction, development, or pest-control-relevant traits. The dataset supports comparative studies across sexes and life stages in this Tephritid fly. Quality metrics support reliable transcript quantification and expression comparison across treatment conditions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0