Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Large-scale human RNA-seq on Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 42.4M short reads (12.4 Gb total), moderate base quality (84.1% Q30), and 42.9% GC, supporting whole-transcriptome expression profiling and rare transcript discovery. Note the moderate quality dip for downstream confidence intervals in lowly-expressed genes; well-suited for meta-analyses requiring genome-wide coverage. Applications: human transcriptomics, differential expression, functional genomics.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0