Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
53/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome short-read sequencing of C. elegans on the HiSeq 2500 provides shallow 3.1× coverage with 1.7 million reads at moderate base quality (94.9% Q20, 84.9% Q30), suitable only for presence/absence genotyping at common variants or low-depth population snapshots. The dataset has limited power for comprehensive variant discovery or rare allele detection. Use primarily for SNP array validation or as a screening pre-filter before deeper sequencing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0