Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome short-read sequencing of C. elegans on the HiSeq 2500 delivers 14× coverage with 7.8 million reads at high base quality (98.6% Q20, 95.3% Q30), enabling detection of most common variants across the ~100 Mb genome. The dataset supports forward genetic mapping and mutation discovery in C. elegans screens. Adequate coverage for reliable genotyping at typical allele frequencies, though rare variant sensitivity may be reduced.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0