Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Lower-depth whole-genome sequencing of *Caenorhabditis elegans* on HiSeq 2500 (~13.9x coverage, ~7.8M reads, 1.39 Gb) with good base quality (89.8% Q30). Best suited for population-level surveys or SNP discovery in bulk samples; investigators requiring high-confidence calls at allele frequencies <5% should seek higher-coverage alternatives. Search: *C. elegans*, population genomics, low-coverage WGS.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0