SRR3441206

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2500 WGS of C. elegans with ~1.52 billion bases and ~15.2× extrapolated coverage at Q30 92.6%, enabling medium-depth SNP discovery and indel detection.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Caenorhabditis elegans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1523804469 reported

total reads 8554303 reported

mean coverage 15.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.6 measured

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured

gc content pct 38.4 measured

mean read length 89.2 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 3.95 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 15.2 extrapolated ×1.2 33%

pct q30 bases 92.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 3.95 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0