SRR3441359

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2500 WGS of C. elegans with ~1.23 billion bases and ~12.3× extrapolated coverage at Q30 95.2%, providing medium-depth whole-genome coverage suitable for variant identification and structural rearrangement detection in this model organism.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Caenorhabditis elegans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1230119245 reported

total reads 6874804 reported

mean coverage 12.3 extrapolated

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 98.6 measured

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured

gc content pct 37.1 measured

mean read length 89.5 measured

mean base quality 37.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 4.42 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 12.3 extrapolated ×1.2 20%

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 4.42 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0