SRR3441391

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing of Caenorhabditis elegans at ~9.6× extrapolated coverage totaling ~963 million bases with Q30 94.7%, providing low-to-moderate depth WGS suitable for SNP discovery and population-level genetic variation in a model nematode.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Caenorhabditis elegans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 963528581 reported

total reads 5377420 reported

mean coverage 9.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 98.4 measured

pct q30 bases 94.7 measured

gc content pct 37.9 measured

mean read length 89.6 measured

mean base quality 36.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 5.25 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 9.6 extrapolated ×1.2 7%

pct q30 bases 94.7 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 5.25 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0