Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Lower-depth whole-genome sequencing of *Caenorhabditis elegans* on HiSeq 2500 with 17x coverage (~9.4M reads, 1.70 Gb) and excellent base quality (93.4% Q30, minimal N), suitable for population-level SNP discovery or genetic mapping when higher coverage is not essential. Not recommended for rare-variant detection. Search: *C. elegans*, low-coverage WGS, population genomics.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0