Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq of laboratory mouse *Mus musculus* on Illumina Genome Analyzer II, yielding 9.76M reads (352 Mb) with perfect base quality (100% Q20 and Q30) but elevated N content (1.295%), representing a smaller dataset suitable for focused gene-discovery studies. High per-read quality compensates for modest size in candidate-gene analysis. Search: mouse transcriptomics, targeted RNA-seq.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0