Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This miRNA-seq dataset from Aedes aegypti (dengue and Zika vector) on the HiSeq 2000 captures ~50 million short reads optimized for small RNA discovery with good quality (92.1% Q20, 88.1% Q30). The high read depth supports robust identification of low-abundance microRNAs and piRNAs across developmental or physiological states. The dataset is well-suited for miRNA target prediction and innate immunity regulatory network inference in this disease vector.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0