SRR3452145

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2500 WGS of C. elegans with ~687 million bases and ~6.9× extrapolated coverage at exceptional Q30 (99.5%), providing low-depth but ultra-high-quality whole-genome data suitable for variant calling despite coverage limitations.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Caenorhabditis elegans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 687540954 reported

total reads 4018070 reported

mean coverage 6.9 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 99.5 measured

gc content pct 34.9 measured

mean read length 94.5 measured

mean base quality 38.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.14 measured

duplication rate pct 1.94 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 6.9 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 99.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.94 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.14 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0