Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome short-read sequencing of C. elegans on the HiSeq 2500 achieves 19.5× coverage with pristine base quality (100% Q20, 98.5% Q30), enabling reliable variant discovery and structural variant detection across the ~100 Mb genome. The dataset supports whole-genome association studies and comprehensive genotyping in forward genetic screens. High coverage and exceptional quality permit confident identification of rare mutations and small indels.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0