Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read bulk RNA-seq of Asian tiger mosquito *Aedes albopictus* on Illumina Genome Analyzer II, generating 19.4M reads (776 Mb) with perfect base quality (100% Q20 and Q30), providing high-confidence transcriptome data for functional genomics and gene-expression profiling in this disease vector. Suitable for comparative transcriptomics among mosquito species. Search: *Aedes* transcriptomics, mosquito genomics.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0