Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 short-read RNA-seq of Drosophila simulans (fruit fly species) with 17.9 million reads and 98.1% Q30 (Q20 99.4%) provides exceptional-quality transcriptomics for this model Drosophila species used in population and evolutionary research. The 52.2% GC (notably higher than sibling D. melanogaster, potentially species-specific) and outstanding base accuracy enable definitive isoform-level discovery and precise SNP genotyping.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0