Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina Genome Analyzer II short-read RNA-seq of Lucilia sericata (green bottle fly) with 17.9 million reads and perfect Q30 100% (Q20 100%) provides exceptional-quality transcriptomics for this medically important blow fly, enabling wound-colonization and immune-gene profiling. The 39.3% GC and flawless base accuracy enable definitive isoform discovery and sensitive detection of genes regulating maggot-mediated wound therapy and fly reproduction.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0