← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Cannabis sativa
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
22317746588
reported
total reads
110483894
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
44.3
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
30
measured
adapter content pct
17.4
measured
duplication rate pct
8.53
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 69/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
30
measured
×0.6
33%
adapter content pct
17.4
measured
×0.4
14%
duplication rate pct
8.53
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0