Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR35343499

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

PacBio Revio long-read WGS with unspecified organism displaying identical metrics to PRJNA1327367 (60.6k reads, 14007.2 bp length, 843.1 Mb) suggests same sample or experiment. The exceptional read length and high accuracy enable reference-quality de novo assembly; minimal data volume requires careful experimental design.

Data type / assay
WGS
Instrument
Revio
Platform
PACBIO_SMRT
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 843125788 reported
total reads 60609 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 98.1 measured
pct q30 bases 95.6 measured
gc content pct 28.3 measured
mean read length 14007.2 measured
mean base quality 38.9 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 2.39 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.6 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 2.39 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 95