Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from Apis mellifera on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, producing 95.6 million short reads with lower Q30 coverage (78.7%) across 4.8 billion bases. The elevated N-content (0.149%) is notable; despite quality issues, the substantial read depth and moderate GC composition (39.7%) may support analyses with aggressive filtering.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0