SRR3586070

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

43/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Metagenomic WGS; F grade driven catastrophically by very low Q30 (66.1%, weighted 1.0), which directly undermines taxonomic assignment accuracy; high N content (8.451%) further degrades utility.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human oral metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 1000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 46040850 reported

total reads 227925 reported

n content pct 8.451 measured

pct q20 bases 73 measured

pct q30 bases 66.1 measured

gc content pct 42.3 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 26.9 measured

adapter content pct 1.64 measured

duplication rate pct 12.66 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 43/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 66.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 12.66 measured ×0.5 85%

adapter content pct 1.64 measured ×0.4 95%

QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0