Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is a mouse miRNA-Seq library (short ~50 bp single-end Illumina HiSeq 2000 reads), and the data are technically clean: pct_q30_bases of 92.3% and a mean base quality of 34.8 indicate excellent per-base accuracy, while zero adapter content and negligible N content (0.024%) mean the reads need little trimming before use. What pulled the grade down to a B is the duplication_rate_pct of 84.7%, which scored 0 and is the single largest drag on the score — though for a small-RNA library this is partly expected, since miRNAs are short, highly abundant, and sequenced to saturation, so a large share of "duplicates" are genuine biological copies rather than PCR artifacts, and you should deduplicate cautiously (or not at all) for quantification. All scored metrics here were directly measured (evidence_strength is reported on measured QC fields), so the read is not provisional, but note that the depth and library-complexity caveats of miRNA-Seq mean this dataset is well-suited to miRNA expression profiling and less so to applications needing high unique-fragment diversity.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.