Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3652245

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

Bulk small-RNA (miRNA-Seq) data from mouse on the Illumina HiSeq 2000, this dataset earns a solid B (83/100) on the strength of its base-level quality: 92.5% of bases at Q30 and a mean base quality of 34.8 indicate clean, reliably called reads, and adapter content reading 0% means the libraries are well-trimmed and ready for alignment. The single metric dragging the grade down is an 86.59% duplication rate, which scored 0 and is the main reason this is a B rather than an A — though for a miRNA-Seq library this is partly expected, since a small, highly expressed pool of mature miRNAs naturally produces many identical reads, so treat it as a flag to watch rather than outright contamination. Because the evidence_strength is low (1) and the core size metrics (total_reads, total_bases) are reported rather than independently measured, this reading should be considered provisional and confirmed by a deeper measured QC pass before high-stakes reuse. On balance the data are trustworthy for differential miRNA expression, but verify that your downstream tool handles duplicates appropriately (e.g. UMI-aware or expression-based counting) given the high duplication.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 372921500 reported
total reads 7458430 reported
n content pct 0.021 measured
pct q20 bases 95.1 measured
pct q30 bases 92.5 measured
gc content pct 45.4 measured
mean read length 50 measured
mean base quality 34.8 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 86.59 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.5 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 34.8 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 86.59 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89