Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3652859

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

82/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

Bulk small-RNA (miRNA-Seq) data from mouse on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, and overall it's a solid, fully measured library that earns its B: base quality is excellent (Q30 at 89.4% and mean base quality ~33.9, both scoring 97–98/100), adapter contamination is effectively zero, and the QC reading is well-grounded since every quality metric here was actually measured rather than extrapolated. The one factor pulling the grade down is the 86% duplication rate, which scored 0/100 — though for miRNA-Seq this is expected and largely benign, because the small, highly expressed miRNA repertoire is naturally sequenced to redundancy, so much of that "duplication" reflects genuine biological abundance rather than PCR artifact. The main practical caveat is depth: at ~6M reads of 50 bp single-end data, the library is adequate for profiling abundant miRNAs but offers limited sensitivity for low-expression species, so reuse is well-suited to differential-expression of common miRNAs and less so to discovery of rare ones. Treat the quality numbers as reliable rather than provisional, but interpret the duplication metric in the small-RNA context before letting it deter reuse.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 300394200 reported
total reads 6007884 reported
n content pct 0.027 measured
pct q20 bases 92.5 measured
pct q30 bases 89.4 measured
gc content pct 45.4 measured
mean read length 50 measured
mean base quality 33.9 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 86.02 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 82/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.4 measured ×1 97%
mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 86.02 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89