Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3653310

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

81/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is a small-RNA (miRNA-Seq) library from mouse, sequenced single-end at 50 bp on a HiSeq 2000, and its B/81 grade rests on metrics that were actually measured rather than extrapolated (evidence_strength = 1), so the reading is firm rather than provisional. Base quality is the dataset's strength: 89.1% of bases at Q30 and a mean base quality of 33.9 mean reads are accurate enough for confident miRNA identification and quantification, and the 0% adapter content indicates clean, properly trimmed inserts—important because adapter readthrough is a common artifact in short small-RNA fragments. The one metric pulling the score down hard is the 82.95% duplication rate (scored 0/100), but this should not be read as library failure: miRNA-Seq targets a small, finite repertoire of short mature sequences, so very high duplication is biologically expected and largely reflects the assay rather than a degraded or over-amplified sample. For reuse, the data are trustworthy for miRNA expression analysis; just treat raw duplication-based filters with caution and rely on the strong per-base quality and absent adapter contamination as the real indicators of fitness.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 123230500 reported
total reads 2464610 reported
n content pct 0.024 measured
pct q20 bases 92.8 measured
pct q30 bases 89.1 measured
gc content pct 45.5 measured
mean read length 50 measured
mean base quality 33.9 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 82.95 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 81/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.1 measured ×1 96%
mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 82.95 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89