Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq of Maniola jurtina (meadow brown butterfly) with 6.9 million reads and 88.9% Q30 provides butterfly transcriptomics data suitable for wing-pattern and life-history trait profiling in this evo-devo model organism. The 32.4% GC (among the lowest in this dataset, possibly tissue-specific) and moderate read depth support expression analysis across seasonal and developmental forms.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0