Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
64/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 short-read RNA-seq of Harpegnathos saltator (Indian jumping ant) with 15.3 million reads and 79% Q30 provides modest-depth NextSeq transcriptomics for this social-insect model, with moderate platform quality. The 50% GC and read depth enable expression quantification across ant castes and behaviors, though shorter read lengths and quality constraints limit isoform reconstruction.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0