Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 short-read RNA-seq of Harpegnathos saltator (Indian jumping ant) with 28.4 million reads, elevated N-content (0.17%), and 89% Q30 provides NextSeq transcriptomics for this social-insect model, enabling caste and behavioral-gene analysis. The 52.2% GC (among the highest, possibly tissue-biased) and read depth support expression quantification across castes, though moderate platform quality and base-calling accuracy warrant careful QC.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0