Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq of Harpegnathos saltator (Indian jumping ant) with 19 million reads and 91.8% Q30 provides transcriptomics data for this social-insect model, enabling caste-differentiation and reproductive-behavior gene profiling. The 43.2% GC and good data quality support tissue-specific and life-stage expression analysis across worker and queen phenotypes.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0