Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 short-read RNA-seq of Nasonia vitripennis (parasitic wasp) with 38.9 million reads and 88.1% Q30 provides deep-coverage transcriptomics for this model insect used in behavioral and developmental genetics, enabling venom, reproduction, and host-seeking gene profiling. The 43.5% GC and substantial read depth enable comprehensive expression analysis across behavioral states and developmental stages.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0