Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Citrus x aurantium (bitter orange) with 46.1 million reads, 11.5 Gb bases, and 88.9% Q20 (81% Q30) provides moderate-quality genome data for this important citrus crop species with complex hybrid genetics. The 41.3% GC and sequencing depth support draft-assembly scaffolding and marker development, though lower Q30 content may limit structural-variant and rare-allele detection.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0